For this reason, i limited all of our analyses so you’re able to participants’ attitudes into homosexual some body, rather than specific ideas comparisons anywhere between gay group
Extremely Puerto Ricans realize specific translation of the Christian society. Offered Christianity’s position towards homosexuality since a sinful existence, this is not alarming to acquire a strong bad connection between religiosity and you can sexual prejudice (Diaz, 1998; Supplier, 1995). Moreover, we requested whether or not religiosity you may raise sexual prejudice by the increasing participants’ ethical resistance to engage that have gay anyone and/or understand any connections that have gay men since positive. Still, a structural design which have religiosity predicting sexual bias together with the most other analysis details is actually discovered to be unreliable and you will unpredictable. Thus, we do not faith religiosity ‘s the operating basis for all most other analysis variables. If you’re an input to cut back individuals’ religiosity is dishonest, we create suggest open discussions away from Christianity’s posture on the sexual positioning versus gay behavior inside spiritual settings (Choice, Serafini, Rabkin, Remien, & Williams, 1994). Such issues could published here possibly get eliminate Puerto Rican’s bad attitudes on gay males and you may female by detatching the focus from stigma regarding homosexual private so you can a specific intimate behavior.
Ultimately, i discovered zero gender variations in brand new relationships anywhere between intimate bias therefore the investigation variables. Nonetheless, the absence of gender difference could be because of all of our measurement regarding intimate bias. The distinctions for the item articles inside our ATL and you will ATG subscales create precise contrasting between the two subscales unfeasible. Earlier studies searching for sex variations in thinking for the homosexuality adapted the new ATLG items text becoming similar with the exception of the fresh site category (we.age., “[Male/Female] homosexuality is actually a great perversion.”) (Herek, 2002a). Alternatively, possibly the differences in intimate bias for the analysis population is maybe not on account of a gender dichotomy however, to help you distinctions around the intercourse spots (Sakalli, 2002). Boys which have better salience into the machismo and in its perceptions regarding masculinity is render higher sexual bias certainly one of people (Cunningham, 1998). Future search would be to speak about exactly how item wording, cultural viewpoints, and you can gender distinctions ong Puerto Ricans.
Still, reviews ranging from all of our model as well as the approach design suggest that religiosity, self-confident skills having gay somebody, and you will number of affairs with gay people and lesbian predicted intimate bias a lot better than the fresh choice causal route
Our very own analysis has several restrictions. Earliest, this new study’s get across-sectional studies limited the organization temporal ordering of your variables. Upcoming browse would be to talk about the fresh new causal relationships within studies parameters. Second, economic and financial support limitations reduced our power to collect a much bigger attempt. More substantial take to that can be split inside arbitrary halves get support extra modifications is made using one half the latest take to, while you are investigations brand new totally-modified model regarding other arbitrary 50 % of. Third, research findings could be non-generalizable to possess Puerto Rican low-college or university communities. Whether or not players appeared motivated to be involved in the analysis, previous lookup discovered people with lower instructional attainment usually get large with the intimate bias (Herek, 2002). Next, we failed to determine if the professionals interacted with homosexual people otherwise lesbians whom notice-disclosed their sexual positioning or if they believed males and you can women have been homosexuals. 5th, our very own inability to assess exactly how many college students absent within per classroom for the survey limits the analysis out-of potential exposure biases. Still, while the analysis range occurred early in this new semester, we feel the possibilities of dropouts and children maybe not browsing lecture could have diminished. In the end, religiosity’s effect on sexual prejudice is really worth higher mining. Our studies is struggling to collect information regarding participants’ religious affiliations. Considering the range regarding Religious traditions (85% Roman Catholic and 15% Protestant or any other; CIA Industry Factbook (2005)), future knowledge should speak about if religiosity’s affect sexual bias varies of the religious living.